When sound came in, Lubitsch reached new heights with his musicals—sprightly, charming, and as suggestive as he could get away with. Having signed another contract with Paramount, the studio where he’d always felt most at home, in 1932 Lubitsch embarked on a fresh era of “comedies without music,” as the critic and playwright James Harvey called them. None would turn out more polished, more flippant, more bracingly adult than Trouble in Paradise.
From its opening frames, the film proclaims the director’s originality. Even back in 1932, a Venetian gondolier with a great singing voice was a common trope. Lubitsch gives us a gondolier who is also the local garbage collector, belting “O sole mio” while taking out the trash. Shortly afterward, we find our expectations flipped again, as a thief jumps from a balcony and runs away—dressed not in some sort of all-black burglar getup but in a well-tailored suit. Then the camera glides back into an opulent suite of rooms and comes to rest on the polished shoes of another man, who is clearly out for the count.
That unconscious man is François Filiba (Edward Everett Horton), and later we will discover what all that was about. In the meantime, most audiences find their Trouble in Paradise bliss just a scene or two later, when Lily, in a stunning lamé evening gown, sweeps in for her rendezvous with Gaston. This will take place—most improperly, but for the time being the censors were taking it easy—in his hotel room. Gaston has donned formal wear and prepared the most perfect dinner for two that money can buy. Other people’s money, that is. That was also Gaston we saw earlier, making away with the wallet of François, “the gentleman in 253, -5, -7, and -9.”
And Lily, after striking some poses and loudly wondering what the local nobility will think of their indiscretion, pinches that very wallet, only to gracefully hand it over when Gaston announces that he’s on to her. Gaston, in turn, gives back to Lily the jeweled pin she wore near her neckline when she came in.
She says, “I like you, Baron”—for Gaston has also helped himself to a title—and returns his watch. We realize this is a contest, and we’re at the finale. Gaston asks if he can keep her garter, holding it up for her to see. Lily feels her leg . . . and practically leaps into his arms.
The scene is so perfectly, deliciously Lubitsch it almost hurts to watch—to wonder, as filmmaker and writer Peter Bogdanovich put it, how America could ever have been that witty, that sophisticated. One answer is that, as always, Lubitsch added a great deal of European worldliness to his American movies. According to Lubitsch biographer Scott Eyman, Trouble in Paradise was loosely based on the Hungarian play The Honest Finder by Aladár László, though Lubitsch said it was “bad” and saw it as just “material.” In fact, when Lubitsch told his screenwriting partner Samson Raphaelson the idea for the project, he didn’t even bring “Rafe” a copy.
The screenplay was supposed to be a whodunit, a form Lubitsch and Raphaelson knew nothing about. Contract writer Grover Jones was called in to help adapt László, but he wasn’t much needed. The script carries echoes of Georges Manolescu, a real-life self-styled master thief whose 1907 memoir had already been made into two silent films. The crooked hero’s name, Gaston Monescu, was deliberately close enough to ring a bell with many. (There are key differences, however. For one thing, if Gaston has ever been caught before, we do not hear about it, unlike with Manolescu, who spent his life in and out of prison—as well as the occasional insane asylum, the thief perhaps having discovered that faking insanity was one way to get out of jail.)
So they fashioned a Lubitsch-Raphaelson version of a whodunit, one that lets you know who-dun-what at nearly every turn. One of Lubitsch’s many gifts, part of his much-publicized “touch,” is that of revealing plot points in ways that make the audience feel like coconspirators. We see that Lily and Gaston are made for each other in one shot at the end of the hotel scene, as they embrace on a couch, then magically dissolve into a night and a life together. They may not be married, but they are a formidable pair, and a short while later a radio reporter confirms it: “From Geneva comes the news that the famous international crook Gaston Monescu robbed the peace conference yesterday. He took practically everything except the peace.”
Soon, the couple land in Paris, and now trouble finds them in the person of Mme Colet, the heiress to a perfume fortune. Her wealth is detailed in another montage—the commercial break for that radio story about Gaston—that shows off the art deco mastery of Paramount designer Hans Dreier. His sets for the Colet offices and duplex are all mirrored surfaces and swooping steel trim; even the “Colet et Cie” lettering echoes the era’s ads for the luxe French perfume brand Caron.