Downhill: Playing for the Old Boys

<em>Downhill: </em>Playing for the Old Boys

Between completing The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog in 1926 and taking on his next assignment early the following year, Alfred Hitchcock made two major changes in his life: He married Alma Reville, who had worked as assistant director on all his films to that point and would remain his most constant collaborator for the rest of his career. And he announced that he was leaving Gainsborough Studios to join a newly established outfit, British National Pictures (later renamed British International Pictures), at a considerably more generous salary. But BNP was having problems getting itself sorted out, and so Hitch—who always hated to be sitting around idle—arranged to have himself loaned back to Gainsborough and made two more films there.

For the first of these, following the success of The Lodger, Hitchcock and his regular screenwriter, Eliot Stannard—whom he took with him to BNP—embarked on another silent project to star Ivor Novello, whose popularity was reckoned to have been a major contributory factor in making the previous film a hit. Downhill (1927, released in the U.S. as When Boys Leave Home) was adapted from a stage play of almost the same title (Down Hill, two words) by “David L’Estrange”—a pseudonym for Novello himself and his writing partner, Constance Collier. It was, Hitchcock told François Truffaut, “a rather poor play . . . The dialogue was pretty dreadful in spots.”

The film’s dialogue isn’t invariably an improvement, despite Stannard’s best efforts. When the hero, a rugby-playing schoolboy who has nobly taken the blame for something his best friend did, is told by the headmaster that he’s being expelled in disgrace, his response is “Won’t I be able to play for the Old Boys, sir?”

Also, the idea of the fey, thirty-four-year-old Novello as a teenage rugby champion is more than a little hard to take. And as the story progresses, a distasteful note of misogyny creeps in (not that this tendency would be absent from later Hitchcock films): four women encompass the downfall of the hero, Roddy Berwick (Novello), and as he finally descends into destitution and delirium, he has a vision of all of them sitting in a row, mocking him.

But even faced with a relatively thin and unappealing story, Hitchcock could bring some imaginative touches to it, drawing in particular on the kind of expressionist visual effects he’d no doubt noted in the work of Fritz Lang, G. W. Pabst, and F. W. Murnau while working at Berlin’s Neubabelsberg Studios. The film falls into three parts, each announced by a title: “The World of Youth,” “The World of Make-Believe,” and “The World of Lost Illusions.” Three levels of reality—or perhaps, as Hitchcock’s treatment suggests, of unreality: as the action progresses, the fantastic quality intensifies. Subjective shots become more frequent, and the experimental techniques that the director loved to explore, especially at this stage in his career, turn steadily bolder and more striking.

To start with, fresh from his triumph on the rugby pitch, Roddy is acclaimed as a hero; watching as he’s borne off shoulder-high in triumph, the headmaster remarks to the lad’s father (Norman McKinnel), “I wish you had more sons like Roddy to send us, Sir Thomas.” Next year, the head tells Roddy, he’ll be school captain. But from this high point, as the title has warned us, it’s going to be all downhill. Or rather, downhill, then up again, then yet further down.

You have no items in your shopping cart